In 2025–2026, investment scams have evolved far beyond simple phishing emails or fake trading platforms. A new class of fraud is emerging — one that specifically targets startup founders, CEOs, and company executives during fundraising processes.
This is not a low-level scam. It is a highly structured simulation of a real investment deal, designed to deceive experienced professionals.
According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, cyber-enabled fraud losses reached nearly $21 billion in 2025, with investment scams among the fastest-growing categories. At the same time, blockchain analytics reports show that investment-related crypto scams remain the dominant fraud type, accounting for a major share of illicit flows.
This article breaks down how this specific scam works — and why even experienced founders fall for it.
Unlike retail investors, startup founders operate in an environment where:
Scammers exploit this context. They don’t try to “convince you to invest.” They position themselves as the investor.
This flips the psychological dynamic: you are no longer cautious — you are evaluating an opportunity.

The scam typically begins with a seemingly legitimate outreach.
A “family office” or investment firm contacts you via:
The firm exists. That’s what makes it dangerous.
However, the person contacting you is not verifiable, has no credible digital footprint and may use a blank or newly created profile.
From there, the interaction escalates.
You’ll have:
Also Read: QNET Review 2026: Business Opportunity or High-Risk Scheme?
At this stage, the scam becomes highly convincing.
You are offered:
Importantly: the commission is framed as payable only after funds are received. This removes immediate suspicion. Contracts may even be signed. Documents may appear legitimate.
In some cases, scammers provide:
Everything aligns with real-world fundraising practices.
This is where the fraud actually happens.
Step 1: Wallet Requirement
You are told:
Reason given: “Exchanges sometimes block transactions.” This sounds plausible.
Step 2: Proof of Funds
You are asked to:
Often during a live call.
Step 3: The “Test Transaction”
You are instructed to send a small amount (e.g., $1) to yourself .
But with a twist: you are told to modify the address slightly (e.g., adding a suffix like “.test”). This exploits how some wallet interfaces display addresses.
Step 4: The Illusion of Return
Shortly after:
But it is not. This is a spoofed address, designed to visually match yours.
Step 5: The Final Transfer
Now comes the critical moment. You are told:
But you are actually sending funds to the attacker. At that point funds are gone and the transaction is irreversible.

This scam does not rely on hacking. It exploits interface limitations and human perception.
Key techniques include:
Research shows that crypto scam operations often use clusters of coordinated addresses to scale attacks and maximize extraction efficiency.
This scam is a hybrid of several fraud categories:
| Component | Description |
|---|---|
| Impersonation Scam | Fake identity of real investment firms |
| Advance-Fee Scam | Payment required before final transaction |
| Crypto Manipulation | Use of blockchain irreversibility |
| Social Engineering | Long-term trust building |
Unlike traditional scams, this model is process-driven, not message-driven. It doesn’t trick you in one step — it walks you through a deal.
Also Read: Crypto Scams in 2026: What’s Getting People Trapped — and What to Do If It Happens
Once funds are transferred:
Recovery becomes extremely difficult. This is a fundamental limitation of blockchain systems: transactions are final by design.
| Indicator | Risk Level |
|---|---|
| Crypto-based commission | HIGH |
| Request for “test transaction” | CRITICAL |
| Address manipulation | CRITICAL |
| Non-verifiable contact person | HIGH |
| Pressure during live call | HIGH |
| Requirement to avoid exchanges | CRITICAL |
Yes — and it represents a shift. This is not a random fraud attempt. It is a simulation of a legitimate investment process. The system does not break blockchain technology. It exploits:
A clear conclusion:
If an investor asks you to perform any crypto transaction before sending funds — especially a “test transaction” — you are not closing a deal. You are entering a scam.

Why target startup founders instead of retail investors?
Because founders expect large deals and are more likely to engage in complex transactions.
Is paying commission in crypto normal?
No. This is a major red flag, especially before receiving funds.
Why use a “test transaction”?
To build trust and manipulate perception of wallet control.
Can blockchain transactions be reversed?
No. Once confirmed, they are final.
How to verify a real investor?
Always confirm identity through official company channels — not just email or calls.
Can this happen in real VC deals?
No legitimate investor requires pre-payment in crypto.
If you interacted with a potential investor and were asked to perform a crypto transaction, you can request a transaction analysis. Specialists of the Stock View team can review wallet activity and help identify potential fraud risks.
Get professional help with your case.